Editorial Policy & Review Process
Our Commitment to Accurate, Transparent, and Unbiased Information About Gaming Applications
Our Transparency Promise
At AsGame.Live, we are committed to publishing accurate, transparent, and unbiased information related to skill-based gaming applications. This Editorial Policy explains how our content is created, reviewed, and maintained, so users understand exactly how we work.
Quick Navigation
1. Our Editorial Independence
Independent Information Platform
AsGame.Live operates as an independent informational platform. Our primary goal is to provide users with accurate, unbiased information to help them make informed decisions.
What We Are Not
❌ No Ownership
We do not own or operate any gaming applications mentioned on our platform. We are observers and analysts, not operators.
❌ No Guarantees
We do not guarantee earnings or outcomes from any gaming applications. Our role is informational, not predictive.
❌ No Manipulation
We do not manipulate rankings or ratings. All assessments are based on objective criteria and transparent evaluation.
❌ No Promotion
We do not exist to promote or mislead users. Our content aims to inform, educate, and raise awareness.
Our Independence Principles
Our editorial independence is built on these core principles:
- Objectivity: We maintain neutral, fact-based perspectives
- Transparency: We disclose our methods and limitations
- Integrity: We refuse compensation for favorable coverage
- Accountability: We stand by our assessments and welcome scrutiny
- User-Centric: We prioritize user needs over commercial interests
Our content exists to inform users, not to promote or mislead them. This principle guides every piece of content we create.
2. How We Review Gaming Apps
Every app mentioned on AsGame.Live goes through a structured review process based on publicly available information and hands-on evaluation.
Our Structured Review Process
Initial Research Phase
- Gather publicly available information from official sources
- Review app documentation, terms of service, and privacy policies
- Study regulatory compliance information
- Collect user feedback from multiple sources
Hands-On Evaluation
- Download and install the application
- Test registration and onboarding processes
- Evaluate user interface and navigation
- Assess game features and functionality
- Test performance on different Android devices
Analysis & Verification
- Verify bonus and withdrawal information
- Evaluate security measures and data protection
- Check KYC and fraud prevention mechanisms
- Analyze responsible gaming tools
- Compare against industry standards
Content Creation & Review
- Compile findings into structured content
- Apply consistent evaluation criteria
- Review for accuracy and completeness
- Ensure balanced presentation of pros and cons
- Add appropriate disclaimers and warnings
Our Review Includes
App Interface & Usability
Detailed evaluation of user experience, navigation, and design quality across different devices and network conditions.
Game Formats & Features
Analysis of available games, tournament structures, betting options, and special features offered by the platform.
Financial Processes
Examination of sign-up processes, bonus structures, deposit methods, withdrawal procedures, and associated fees.
Safety & Security Measures
Assessment of data protection practices, encryption standards, KYC requirements, and fraud prevention systems.
Legal & Compliance Information
Review of publicly stated legal compliance, licensing information, and jurisdictional restrictions.
User Feedback Analysis
Study of common user concerns, complaints, app store reviews, and community feedback from multiple sources.
Our Review Philosophy
We aim to present balanced, factual, and easy-to-understand information. Our reviews are structured to help users quickly grasp key features, benefits, and potential concerns about each gaming application.
3. Review Criteria
Apps are evaluated using the following comprehensive criteria to ensure consistent, objective assessments:
🔍 Usability & User Experience
- App navigation and design clarity
- Stability and performance on Android devices
- Loading times and responsiveness
- Ease of registration and login processes
- Intuitive interface and control schemes
- Accessibility features and options
🔐 Safety & Security
- Data protection and privacy practices
- Payment gateway security and encryption
- Withdrawal transparency and reliability
- KYC procedures and identity verification
- Fraud prevention and detection measures
- Account security features
📜 Legal & Compliance Awareness
- Skill-based game structure verification
- Publicly stated legal information accuracy
- Compliance with Indian gaming regulations
- Age verification mechanisms
- Responsible gaming tools and features
- Transparency in terms and conditions
💬 User Feedback & Public Data
- Common user concerns and complaints
- App store reviews and ratings analysis
- Community feedback from forums and social media
- Publicly available updates and announcements
- Customer support responsiveness
- Issue resolution effectiveness
Scoring & Rating Methodology
While we don't use numerical scores, we assess applications based on:
Performance Evaluation
How well does the app perform its core functions? Is it reliable, stable, and responsive?
Feature Assessment
What features does it offer? How do they compare to industry standards and user expectations?
Safety Verification
How secure is user data and money? What measures are in place to prevent fraud and abuse?
User Experience Analysis
Is the app easy to use? Does it provide a positive experience for both new and experienced users?
Value Proposition
What value does it offer users? Are fees reasonable? Are bonuses and promotions transparent?
Our criteria are designed to provide comprehensive, balanced assessments that help users make informed decisions.
4. No Paid Rankings or Guaranteed Reviews
⚠️ Strict Non-Commercial Policy
We maintain complete editorial independence by refusing any form of paid influence over our content.
What We Do Not Accept
💰 No Paid Reviews
We do not accept payment in exchange for positive reviews. All assessments are based on objective evaluation.
📊 No Paid Rankings
We do not accept payment for higher rankings or preferential placement in comparisons or lists.
📝 No Guaranteed Coverage
We do not guarantee that any application will be reviewed or featured on our platform.
🚫 No Information Suppression
We do not accept payment to suppress negative information or critical findings.
Our Revenue Transparency
How We Operate Financially
Any mention of bonuses, features, or app benefits is based on publicly available information, not financial influence.
- We do not receive commissions for positive reviews
- We do not have revenue-sharing agreements with gaming platforms
- We do not accept sponsored content disguised as objective reviews
- We do not participate in affiliate programs that influence editorial content
Selection Criteria for Reviews
We select applications for review based on:
- User Interest: Popularity and search volume among Indian users
- Market Relevance: Significance in the Indian gaming market
- Safety Concerns: Applications raising user safety questions
- Regulatory Changes: Apps affected by new regulations or legal developments
- User Requests: Applications frequently requested by our audience
Our review selection is based on informational value, not commercial potential.
5. Affiliate & Advertising Transparency
🔍 Complete Advertising Transparency
We believe users have the right to know when they're viewing advertising content versus editorial content.
Types of Commercial Content
AsGame.Live may display the following types of commercial content:
Advertisements
Display ads from advertising networks (like Google AdSense) that are clearly marked as advertisements and separated from editorial content.
Referral Links
Links that may provide referral benefits if users sign up through them. These are always disclosed and do not affect our editorial content.
Affiliate Links
Links that may earn commission on qualifying purchases or actions. These are clearly identified and separated from objective information.
Our Advertising Principles
Advertising Guidelines
- Clear Separation: Advertising content is always clearly distinguished from editorial content <
- No Editorial Influence: Advertising relationships do not influence our reviews, rankings, or content accuracy
- User Choice: Users are never required to click ads or links to access our informational content
- Relevance Standards: We maintain standards for the types of advertisements displayed
- Transparency: We disclose the nature of any commercial relationships that could be relevant to users
⚠️ Important Distinction
Advertising and affiliate relationships do not influence our editorial decisions, content accuracy, or review outcomes.
An app's participation in advertising or affiliate programs has no bearing on:
- Whether we review the application
- How we evaluate the application
- What information we include in our review
- How we present the application relative to competitors
User Protections
We implement several protections to ensure advertising doesn't compromise user experience:
- Clear visual distinction between ads and content
- No auto-play video or audio ads
- No pop-ups or intrusive ad formats
- No misleading "download" buttons disguised as ads
- Clear labeling of all commercial content
6. Content Accuracy & Updates
🔄 Continuous Accuracy Commitment
We strive to keep our content accurate, relevant, and up-to-date in a rapidly changing industry.
Our Accuracy Standards
Fact-Checking Process
All information is verified against multiple sources including official documentation, user reports, and direct testing where possible.
Source Verification
We prioritize information from official sources and cross-reference with user experiences to ensure balanced perspectives.
Transparency About Limitations
We clearly state what information is based on testing versus public sources versus user reports.
Regular Review Cycles
All content undergoes periodic review to ensure continued accuracy and relevance.
Update Frequency & Triggers
We update content based on several triggers:
Scheduled Reviews
All content is reviewed at least every 6 months to ensure accuracy and relevance.
Major App Updates
When applications release significant updates affecting features, security, or user experience.
Regulatory Changes
When gaming laws or regulations change in India or specific states.
User Reports
When users report significant changes or inaccuracies in our content.
Security Incidents
When applications experience significant security breaches or fraud incidents.
⚠️ Important Disclaimer
Gaming apps may change features, policies, or availability without notice. While we make every effort to keep our content current, we cannot guarantee real-time accuracy of all information.
Users are encouraged to verify details from official app sources before taking action. Always check the latest information directly from application websites or official communications.
Content Accuracy Indicators
To help users assess information currency, we provide:
- Clear "Last Updated" dates on all pages
- Update notes when content is significantly revised
- Timestamps for time-sensitive information
- Clear indication of information sources
- Disclaimer about potential changes since publication
7. Corrections & Feedback
📝 We Welcome Corrections & Feedback
Accuracy is a continuous process. We value input from users, app developers, and industry experts to improve our content.
When to Contact Us
We welcome corrections and feedback if you believe:
Outdated Information
Information on our site no longer reflects current app features, policies, or availability.
Factual Errors
We've published information that is factually incorrect or misleading.
Missing Context
Our content lacks important context or omits significant information.
Clarification Needed
Our explanations could be clearer or more detailed to help users understand.
Our Correction Process
Report Submission
Users submit correction requests or feedback through our contact channels with specific details and supporting evidence.
Initial Review
Our editorial team reviews the submission within 48 hours to assess validity and urgency.
Verification
We verify the reported issue against current information from official sources and user reports.
Content Update
If verification confirms an issue, we update the content promptly with appropriate corrections or clarifications.
Confirmation
We notify users who reported significant errors about the corrections made (when contact information is provided).
Contact for Corrections
📧 Email: support@asgame.live
Please include specific page URLs, detailed descriptions of issues, and any supporting evidence.
What Happens After Correction
- Corrected content is marked with update dates
- Significant corrections may include editor's notes
- We analyze patterns in corrections to improve processes
- We maintain correction logs for transparency
- We thank users who help improve our accuracy
8. Ethical Standards
⚖️ Our Ethical Framework
Our editorial team follows strict ethical guidelines to maintain trust and provide genuinely helpful information.
Core Ethical Principles
No Misleading Claims
We never exaggerate benefits, downplay risks, or make claims we cannot substantiate with evidence.
No False Promises
We never promise specific outcomes, earnings, or results from using any gaming application.
No Pressure Tactics
We never use urgency, scarcity, or fear-based tactics to influence user decisions.
No Irresponsible Promotion
We never encourage excessive gaming, chasing losses, or gaming beyond means.
Editorial Team Standards
All members of our editorial team adhere to:
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Team members must disclose any personal or financial interests in gaming applications.
Professional Conduct
Team members maintain professional standards in all research, writing, and communication.
Continuous Education
Team members stay updated on industry developments, regulations, and best practices.
Accountability
Team members take responsibility for the accuracy and quality of their work.
User-Centric Focus
Team members prioritize user needs and safety in all content decisions.
Our Guiding Principle
User trust and safety come first. Every editorial decision, from topic selection to final publication, is guided by what best serves our users' informational needs and safety concerns.
Quality Assurance Process
All content undergoes multiple quality checks:
- Fact-Checking: Verification of all factual claims
- Source Review: Evaluation of information sources
- Balance Assessment: Ensuring fair presentation of pros and cons
- Clarity Review: Ensuring information is understandable
- Compliance Check: Verifying alignment with policies
- Safety Review: Ensuring responsible gaming messaging
9. Responsible Gaming Alignment
🎮 Gaming as Entertainment, Not Dependency
All content on AsGame.Live aligns with our Responsible Gaming Policy. We emphasize safety, awareness, and balanced perspectives.
Responsible Gaming Integration
18+ Age Restriction Emphasis
We consistently remind users that all gaming content is intended for adults aged 18+ only.
Financial Risk Awareness
We clearly communicate that gaming involves financial risk and potential loss.
No Income Guarantees
We repeatedly state that gaming should not be viewed as an income source.
Entertainment Focus
We frame gaming as entertainment, not financial opportunity or dependency.
Content Alignment Framework
Every piece of content is evaluated against these responsible gaming criteria:
Risk Disclosure
Does the content clearly disclose financial and addiction risks?
Age Appropriateness
Does the content appropriately restrict itself to adult audiences?
Balanced Perspective
Does the content balance potential benefits with risks and limitations?
Safety Emphasis
Does the content prioritize user safety over excitement or engagement?
Help Resources
Does the content provide or reference help resources when appropriate?
⚠️ Content Restrictions
We will not publish content that:
- Encourages excessive gaming or chasing losses
- Promises unrealistic earnings or outcomes
- Targets vulnerable or underage audiences
- Downplays risks or consequences
- Uses pressure tactics or urgency appeals
- Frames gaming as solution to financial problems
Editorial Responsibility in Gaming Content
Our editorial team understands that gaming content carries special responsibilities:
- We prioritize user safety over content engagement metrics
- We include responsible gaming reminders in appropriate contexts
- We provide balanced perspectives on gaming applications
- We reference our Responsible Gaming Policy where relevant
- We maintain appropriate tone for discussing financial risk
Gaming should remain entertainment, not dependency. This principle guides every aspect of our gaming-related content.
10. Editorial Control
✍️ Full Editorial Independence
Final editorial decisions rest solely with the AsGame.Live content team. We maintain complete control over our content to ensure objectivity and integrity.
What We Control
Content Selection
We decide which applications to review, which topics to cover, and which information to prioritize.
Evaluation Criteria
We establish and apply our own criteria for assessing gaming applications.
Content Presentation
We determine how information is organized, presented, and communicated to users.
Editorial Tone & Approach
We establish the tone, style, and approach that best serves our informational mission.
What External Parties Cannot Control
External parties do not control our:
Reviews & Assessments
No external party can influence our evaluation of applications or our published opinions.
Rankings & Comparisons
No external party can determine how we rank applications or what comparisons we make.
Information Inclusion
No external party can dictate what information we include or exclude from our content.
Content Timing
No external party can determine when we publish or update content.
Corrections & Updates
No external party can control how we handle corrections, updates, or content revisions.
⚠️ Independence Safeguards
To protect our editorial independence, we:
- Refuse all forms of editorial influence from external parties
- Maintain clear separation between editorial and commercial functions
- Document and review potential conflicts of interest
- Establish clear editorial guidelines that cannot be overridden
- Ensure editorial team members understand and uphold independence principles
Accountability Structure
While we maintain editorial control, we also maintain accountability:
- Our editorial team is accountable to our stated policies and standards
- We welcome and respond to user feedback and correction requests
- We maintain transparency about our processes and limitations
- We regularly review and update our editorial policies
- We document significant editorial decisions and their rationales
Editorial control enables integrity; accountability ensures responsibility. We balance both to serve our users effectively.
11. Contact Information
Editorial Inquiries & Concerns
For editorial inquiries, corrections, or transparency concerns, contact us at:
📧 support@asgame.live
🌐 Website: https://asgame.live
Types of Editorial Inquiries
Correction Requests
Report factual errors, outdated information, or missing context in our content.
Transparency Questions
Ask questions about our editorial processes, standards, or decision-making.
Content Suggestions
Suggest topics, applications, or issues that warrant coverage or deeper analysis.
Policy Feedback
Provide feedback on our editorial policies, standards, or implementation.
What to Include in Your Message
To help us address your inquiry effectively, please include:
- Specific Reference: URL or title of the content in question
- Detailed Description: Clear explanation of your concern or question
- Supporting Information: Evidence, sources, or examples that support your inquiry
- Contact Preference: How you'd like us to respond (email is standard)
- Timeline: Urgency level if time-sensitive
Response Commitment
Our Response Standards
- Initial Acknowledgment: Within 48 hours for all inquiries
- Substantive Response: Within 5 business days for detailed inquiries
- Correction Timeline: Verified corrections implemented within 7 business days
- Feedback Consideration: All substantive feedback reviewed and considered
- Confidentiality: All inquiries handled with appropriate confidentiality
Additional Contact Points
For specific types of inquiries:
Legal Inquiries
Use the same email with "Legal" in the subject line for formal legal communications.
Partnership Inquiries
Use the same email with "Partnership" in the subject line for business development inquiries.
Media Inquiries
Use the same email with "Media" in the subject line for press or media inquiries.
We value open communication and welcome all inquiries that help us improve our content and maintain our standards.
Our Ongoing Commitment
This Editorial Policy represents our commitment to accuracy, transparency, and user trust. We regularly review and update these standards to ensure they remain relevant and effective in serving our users' informational needs.
Transparency builds trust. Accuracy builds credibility. Integrity builds reputation.